flowchart LR
O[Only O] --> Lic[License]
OI[O + I] --> Exp[Export]
OLI[O + L + I] --> FDI[Foreign Direct<br/>Investment]
classDef default fill:#003366,color:#ffffff,stroke:#ffcc00,stroke-width:3px,rx:10px,ry:10px;
5 Foreign direct investment (FDI) and Foreign portfolio investment (FPI); Types of FDI, Costs and benefits of FDI to home and host countries; Trends in FDI; India’s FDI policy
5.1 Concept of Foreign Investment
When residents of one country acquire financial or real assets in another country, the flow is called foreign investment. The IMF’s Balance of Payments Manual divides it into two main categories on the basis of control and purpose: Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) — investment giving the investor effective managerial control over the host enterprise (≥ 10 % voting equity) — and Foreign Portfolio Investment (FPI) — investment in financial assets without the intent of management control.
| Category | Defining feature | Threshold | Time horizon |
|---|---|---|---|
| Foreign Direct Investment | Lasting interest and management control | ≥ 10 % voting equity | Long-term |
| Foreign Portfolio Investment | Pure financial return; no control | < 10 % voting equity | Short-to-medium term |
| Other Investment | Loans, banking flows, trade credit | n.a. | Variable |
5.2 Forms of FDI
FDI can take several legal and operational forms.
| Form | Description | Indian illustration |
|---|---|---|
| Greenfield investment | Setting up a new enterprise from scratch | Hyundai’s plant in Sriperumbudur |
| Brownfield investment | Acquiring or upgrading an existing facility | Tata Steel’s acquisition of Corus |
| Cross-border M&A | Buying or merging with a foreign firm | Walmart-Flipkart |
| Joint venture with majority equity | Partnership with a local firm; foreign partner > 10 % | Maruti Suzuki |
| Reinvested earnings | Foreign affiliate’s profits ploughed back | Many MNC subsidiaries in India |
A separate distinction: horizontal FDI replicates home-country activity abroad (Toyota making cars in the US); vertical FDI moves a stage of the value chain abroad (backward to secure inputs, forward to secure distribution); conglomerate FDI is unrelated to existing business.
5.3 Routes of FDI in India
The Government of India routes FDI proposals through two channels:
- Automatic route — no prior government approval; investor files post-investment intimation with RBI. Most sectors fall here, with sectoral caps.
- Government route — prior approval from the relevant administrative ministry. Sensitive sectors: defence (above 74 %), broadcasting content, print media, any investment from a country sharing a land border with India (Press Note 3 of 2020).
A negative list prohibits FDI altogether: gambling, lottery, atomic energy, chit funds, Nidhi, tobacco manufacture, real-estate trading (other than construction development), railway operations (with exceptions).
5.4 Theories of FDI
Why do firms invest abroad rather than simply export or license? Five strands of theory answer:
5.4.1 Hymer’s Monopolistic Advantage Theory (1960)
Stephen Hymer (PhD thesis 1960, published 1976) argued that a firm investing abroad must possess firm-specific advantages — superior technology, brand, marketing skill, scale economies — strong enough to overcome the liability of foreignness.
5.4.2 Vernon’s Product Cycle Theory (1966)
Already discussed in trade theories. As a product matures, production migrates from the innovator country to lower-cost economies; FDI is the vehicle.
5.4.3 Internalisation Theory — Buckley & Casson (1976)
Peter Buckley and Mark Casson (The Future of the Multinational Enterprise, 1976) — when markets for an intermediate good or knowledge fail, the firm internalises the transaction by setting up a wholly-owned subsidiary. FDI is a response to market failure in licensing or arm’s-length trade.
5.4.4 Aliber’s Currency Areas Theory (1970)
Robert Aliber linked FDI to currency strength: firms based in strong-currency countries can borrow more cheaply on world markets and therefore invest abroad more competitively than host-country firms.
5.4.5 Dunning’s Eclectic Paradigm — OLI (1977 onward)
John Dunning’s eclectic / OLI paradigm synthesises earlier theories. A firm undertakes FDI when all three OLI advantages are present:
| Letter | Advantage | Illustrative content |
|---|---|---|
| O | Ownership | Firm-specific advantage — patents, brand, technology, management skill |
| L | Location | Host-country advantage — cheap labour, market size, raw material, tax incentive |
| I | Internalisation | Gain from in-house production rather than licensing; protects know-how |
When only O is present → license. O + I without L → export. Only O + L + I all present → FDI.
5.5 Dunning’s Four Motives for FDI
Dunning (1993) classified FDI motives:
| Motive | What the investor seeks | Illustration |
|---|---|---|
| Market-seeking | Access to host-country market | Suzuki in India to sell to Indian consumers |
| Resource-seeking | Cheaper or unique inputs | Oil majors in Middle East; mining in Africa |
| Efficiency-seeking | Lower cost of production; scale | Nike outsourcing manufacture to Vietnam |
| Strategic asset-seeking | Acquire technology, brands, R&D capability | Tata Motors’ acquisition of Jaguar Land Rover (2008) |
Mnemonic: MRES (Market, Resource, Efficiency, Strategic-asset).
5.6 Benefits and Costs to the Host Country
| Benefits | Costs |
|---|---|
| Capital inflow without debt obligation | Profit repatriation drains foreign exchange |
| Transfer of technology and know-how | Crowding-out of domestic firms |
| Employment generation | Pressure on local labour standards |
| Managerial and skill upgrade | Possible suppression of indigenous R&D |
| Export earnings and BoP support | Sovereignty and regulatory concerns |
| Increased competition and consumer choice | Cultural erosion in some sectors |
| Tax revenue and ancillary cluster development | Transfer-pricing and tax-base erosion |
5.7 Benefits and Costs to the Home Country
| Benefits | Costs |
|---|---|
| Higher returns from foreign operations | Loss of domestic employment (“hollowing out”) |
| Access to foreign markets and resources | Outflow of capital |
| Geographic diversification of risk | Possible technology transfer to potential rivals |
| Strengthens home-country firms’ global position | Tension with host-country regulators |
5.8 Foreign Portfolio Investment (FPI)
FPI is the purchase of financial securities — equity below the 10 % threshold, government and corporate bonds, derivatives — by non-residents. FPI flows are managed by Foreign Portfolio Investors (FPIs), a SEBI category since 2014 (FPI Regulations, now 2019) that replaced the older FIIs / Sub-Accounts / QFIs.
Three features:
- No managerial control — investor seeks return, not control.
- High liquidity and reversibility — can exit overnight; hence “hot money”.
- Sensitivity to global cues — US Fed rate decisions, risk-on/risk-off cycles, currency moves drive flows.
5.9 FDI vs FPI — Comparison
| Dimension | FDI | FPI |
|---|---|---|
| Objective | Lasting interest and management control | Financial return only |
| Equity threshold (IMF norm) | ≥ 10 % | < 10 % |
| Time horizon | Long-term | Short-to-medium |
| Reversibility | Difficult, costly | Easy, instant |
| Volatility | Low | High |
| Effect on real economy | Builds capacity, employment, technology | Provides liquidity, deepens markets |
| Sensitivity to global cues | Moderate | Very high |
| Indian regulator | DPIIT + sectoral ministries + RBI | SEBI + RBI |
5.10 Trends in FDI
5.10.1 Global
- Global FDI peaked at over USD 2 trillion (2007); fell sharply after 2008 GFC; volatile since.
- Top destinations (recent years): USA, China, Singapore, India, Brazil.
- Sectoral shift toward services (IT, finance, telecom) and high-tech manufacturing.
- Rising importance of South-South FDI — Chinese, Indian, ASEAN FDI flowing to other emerging markets.
5.10.2 India
- India ranked among the top 10 FDI destinations globally.
- FDI inflows: ~USD 70+ billion (recent annual peaks).
- Sectoral pattern: services, computer software & hardware, telecom, trading, construction.
- Top source countries: Singapore (overtook Mauritius after 2016 protocol revision), Mauritius, USA, Netherlands, Japan.
- FDI Confidence Index by Kearney consistently ranks India among the most attractive emerging-market destinations.
5.11 India’s FDI Policy
India progressively liberalised after 1991. The current framework rests on:
- Consolidated FDI Policy by DPIIT (latest version periodically issued).
- FEMA 1999 and Foreign Exchange Management (Non-Debt Instruments) Rules 2019.
- Press Notes by DPIIT — Press Note 3 of 2020 introduced the land-border restriction.
| Sector | Cap | Route |
|---|---|---|
| Most manufacturing | 100 % | Automatic |
| Single-brand retail | 100 % | Automatic (with conditions on local sourcing) |
| Multi-brand retail | 51 % | Government |
| Insurance | 74 % | Automatic (since 2021) |
| Defence | Up to 74 % | Automatic; beyond → Government |
| Banking — Private | 74 % | Automatic up to 49 %; Government beyond |
| Telecom | 100 % | Automatic (since 2021) |
| Civil aviation — Scheduled | 100 % | Automatic up to 49 %; Government beyond |
| Print media — News | 26 % | Government |
| Broadcasting content | Various | Mostly Government |
(Caps update periodically; specific conditions apply per sector.)
5.12 Practice Questions
Which of the following is not a feature distinguishing FDI from FPI?
View solution
As per the IMF benchmark, the minimum equity holding that classifies an investment as FDI is:
View solution
Which of the following is not a form of FDI?
View solution
Match the FDI theorist with the central proposition:
| Theorist | Proposition | ||
| (i) | Stephen Hymer | (a) | OLI — Ownership, Location, Internalisation |
| (ii) | John Dunning | (b) | Strong-currency firms can invest abroad more cheaply |
| (iii) | Buckley & Casson | (c) | FDI requires firm-specific monopolistic advantages |
| (iv) | Robert Aliber | (d) | Internalisation as a response to market failure |
View solution
Match each component of Dunning's OLI with its content:
| OLI | Content | ||
| (i) | Ownership | (a) | Cheap labour, large market, raw material at host site |
| (ii) | Location | (b) | Patents, brand, management skill possessed by the firm |
| (iii) | Internalisation | (c) | Gains from in-house production over licensing |
View solution
"Tata Motors acquires Jaguar Land Rover in 2008 to gain access to its design capability, brand and global dealer network." This is best classified, in Dunning's typology, as:
View solution
Under Press Note 3 of 2020, FDI from countries sharing a land border with India requires:
View solution
FDI in India is prohibited in which of the following?
View solution
The FDI cap in the Indian insurance sector was raised in 2021 to:
View solution
FPI in India is regulated by:
View solution
The expression "hot money" most closely refers to:
View solution
A pharmaceutical MNC sets up a new R&D-and-manufacturing campus in Hyderabad. This is:
View solution
After the 2016 protocol revision of the India-Mauritius DTAA, the largest single source of FDI in India by inflow value has typically been:
View solution
Arrange Dunning's four FDI motives in the order in which a typical multinational's foreign operations historically expand:
(i) Resource-seeking
(ii) Market-seeking
(iii) Efficiency-seeking
(iv) Strategic asset-seeking
View solution
Which of the following is not typically a benefit of FDI to the host country?
View solution
The "hollowing out" concern relates to FDI's effect on the:
View solution
Match the FDI theory with its principal author:
| Theory | Author | ||
| (i) | Monopolistic Advantage Theory | (a) | John Dunning |
| (ii) | Eclectic / OLI Paradigm | (b) | Buckley & Casson |
| (iii) | Internalisation Theory | (c) | Robert Aliber |
| (iv) | Currency Areas Theory | (d) | Stephen Hymer |
View solution
The legal framework governing FDI in India is provided by:
View solution
FDI in defence is permitted up to which limit under the automatic route?
View solution
The SEBI category "Foreign Portfolio Investor" (FPI) was introduced to replace which of the following older categories?
View solution
5.13 Quick Recall
- FDI = lasting interest + management control; IMF threshold ≥ 10 % voting equity. FPI = pure financial return; no control; < 10 %.
- Forms of FDI: Greenfield, Brownfield, Cross-border M&A, Joint venture, Reinvested earnings; Horizontal / Vertical / Conglomerate.
- Routes in India: Automatic (no prior approval) vs Government (prior approval). Press Note 3 of 2020 — land-border countries → Government route.
- Prohibited FDI: lottery, gambling, atomic energy, chit funds, Nidhi, tobacco, real-estate trading, railways (with exceptions).
- Theories: Hymer (monopolistic advantage), Vernon (product cycle), Buckley & Casson (internalisation), Aliber (currency areas), Dunning (OLI eclectic).
- Dunning’s OLI: O + L + I. Only O → license; O + I → export; O + L + I → FDI.
- Dunning’s four motives: Market, Resource, Efficiency, Strategic asset — mnemonic MRES.
- FPI = “hot money” — fast reversal.
- Indian regulators: DPIIT + sectoral ministry + RBI for FDI; SEBI + RBI for FPI.
- FEMA 1999 + Non-Debt Instruments Rules 2019 + Consolidated FDI Policy.
- Sectoral caps (selected): Insurance 74 % (since 2021), Defence 74 % automatic, Telecom 100 %, Single-brand retail 100 % automatic, Multi-brand 51 % Government.
- Top FDI sources: Singapore (since 2017), Mauritius, USA, Netherlands, Japan.
- 2008 — Tata Motors acquires JLR = textbook strategic-asset-seeking FDI.