flowchart LR
CB[Capital Budgeting<br/>Techniques] --> NC[Non-Discounted]
CB --> DC[Discounted]
NC --> PB[Payback]
NC --> ARR[ARR]
DC --> NPV[NPV]
DC --> IRR[IRR]
DC --> MIRR[MIRR]
DC --> PI[PI]
DC --> DPB[Discounted Payback]
classDef default fill:#003366,color:#ffffff,stroke:#ffcc00,stroke-width:3px,rx:10px,ry:10px;
31 Capital budgeting decisions: Conventional and scientific techniques of capital budgeting analysis
31.1 Concept of Capital Budgeting
Capital budgeting is the process of evaluating, selecting and prioritising long-term investment projects whose returns are expected over more than one year. Examples: building a new plant, launching a new product line, acquiring another company, replacing old machinery, computerising operations. Because the decisions involve large outlays, long horizons, irreversibility and uncertainty, they are arguably the most important decisions a firm’s management makes. Capital-budgeting techniques fall into two families: conventional (Payback, ARR — ignore time value of money) and scientific / discounted (NPV, IRR, PI, Discounted Payback — apply time value).
31.2 Why Capital Budgeting Matters
- Substantial funds — typically large outlays.
- Long-term — benefits stream over many years.
- Irreversibility — capital tied up; resale value often low.
- Determines productive capacity of the firm.
- Affects competitive position — better technology, better cost.
- Affects risk profile — operating leverage rises with fixed-asset investment.
- Affects future cost structure and pricing.
31.3 Classification of Capital Investments
- Replacement projects — replace worn-out or obsolete assets.
- Expansion of existing line — add capacity for existing products.
- Diversification — new products or markets.
- Research and Development — usually large risk and uncertain return.
- Mandatory (regulatory) — pollution-control, safety; not optional.
- Statutory — required by law (BIS, fire safety).
- Strategic / Long-range — building competitive advantage.
31.4 Cash-Flow Estimation
Most capital-budgeting methods evaluate cash flows, not accounting profits. Three reasons: cash is objective, time-able, and the only thing that funds future investment or dividends.
- Use after-tax cash flows, not pre-tax.
- Include incremental cash flows only — change due to the project.
- Add back depreciation (non-cash) after tax computation.
- Include opportunity costs of resources diverted from elsewhere.
- Exclude sunk costs — already incurred, irrelevant.
- Include side-effects — cannibalisation, synergies.
- Treat working capital changes as cash outflow when increased; inflow when released.
- Include terminal / salvage values, net of tax.
31.5 Conventional (Non-Discounted) Techniques
31.5.1 Payback Period
The payback period = number of years to recover the initial investment from project cash inflows.
\[\text{Payback} = \frac{\text{Initial Investment}}{\text{Annual Cash Inflow}} \quad \text{(if cash inflows constant)}\]
For uneven cash flows, accumulate until the outflow is recovered.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Simple and easy to compute | Ignores time value of money |
| Emphasises liquidity and short-term risk | Ignores cash flows after the payback period |
| Useful for risky or rapidly-changing industries | Ignores profitability beyond breakeven |
31.5.2 Accounting Rate of Return (ARR)
\[\text{ARR} = \frac{\text{Average Annual PAT}}{\text{Average Investment}} \times 100\]
where Average Investment often = (Initial cost + Salvage)/2 or (Initial cost)/2.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Uses accounting figures readily available | Uses accounting profit, not cash flows |
| Easy to compute | Ignores time value of money |
| Considers entire project life | Multiple formulae give different ARR values |
31.6 Scientific (Discounted) Techniques
31.6.1 Net Present Value (NPV)
The NPV is the present value of cash inflows minus the initial investment (and any future outflows), all discounted at the firm’s cost of capital:
\[NPV = -I_0 + \sum_{t=1}^{n} \frac{CF_t}{(1+r)^t}\]
- NPV > 0 → Accept the project.
- NPV < 0 → Reject.
- NPV = 0 → Indifferent.
- For mutually exclusive projects: choose the one with the highest NPV.
31.6.2 Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
The IRR is the discount rate at which NPV = 0:
\[0 = -I_0 + \sum_{t=1}^{n} \frac{CF_t}{(1+IRR)^t}\]
- IRR > cost of capital → Accept.
- IRR < cost of capital → Reject.
- Compute via trial-and-error or interpolation.
- Limitations: multiple IRRs for non-conventional cash flows; reinvestment assumption at IRR may be unrealistic; can mislead in mutually exclusive projects.
31.6.3 Modified IRR (MIRR)
To address the reinvestment-rate problem, MIRR assumes reinvestment of intermediate cash flows at the cost of capital rather than at the IRR. MIRR is unique and consistent with NPV ranking.
31.6.4 Profitability Index (PI) / Benefit-Cost Ratio
\[PI = \frac{PV \text{ of inflows}}{Initial Investment}\]
- PI > 1 → Accept.
- PI < 1 → Reject.
- For capital rationing, rank projects by PI — most NPV per rupee of investment.
31.6.5 Discounted Payback Period
Same as payback but using discounted cash flows. Overcomes the time-value criticism of simple payback but still ignores cash flows after recovery.
31.6.6 Comparison
| Aspect | NPV | IRR |
|---|---|---|
| Measure | Absolute (₹) | Percentage |
| Reinvestment | At cost of capital | At IRR |
| Multiple roots | No | Yes (non-conventional CF) |
| Decision in mutually exclusive | Reliable | Can mislead |
| Comparability across projects | Direct | Comparable |
| Theoretically | Superior | Less robust |
PYQs often ask: which method is theoretically superior? NPV — because (a) absolute rupee value, (b) consistent with shareholder-wealth maximisation, (c) realistic reinvestment assumption, (d) no multiple-root problem.
31.7 Risk in Capital Budgeting
- Risk-adjusted discount rate (RADR) — riskier projects discounted at higher rate.
- Certainty Equivalent (CE) approach — multiply each risky CF by a CE coefficient (< 1).
- Sensitivity analysis — change one input at a time; observe NPV.
- Scenario analysis — multiple coherent scenarios (best, base, worst).
- Simulation / Monte Carlo — random sampling from input distributions.
- Decision trees — sequential decision pathways with probabilities.
- Real options — value the flexibility embedded in projects (expand, abandon, defer).
31.8 Capital Rationing
When the firm cannot finance every NPV-positive project (due to budget constraint), it must ration capital — choose the combination of projects that maximises aggregate NPV within the budget. Methods:
- Profitability Index ranking — rank by PI; choose in order.
- Integer programming — for indivisible projects with multi-period budgets.
- Project bundles — choose combinations with highest total NPV within budget.
31.9 Practice Questions
Accept a project if:
View solution
IRR is the discount rate that makes:
View solution
Initial investment ₹50,000; annual cash inflow ₹10,000. Payback period:
View solution
PV of inflows ₹1,20,000; Initial investment ₹1,00,000. Profitability Index:
View solution
Which method is theoretically the **best** capital-budgeting technique?
View solution
For capital-budgeting analysis, the relevant flows are:
View solution
In project evaluation, sunk costs should be:
View solution
A key limitation of payback is:
View solution
Multiple IRRs can arise when:
View solution
Under capital rationing, projects are typically ranked by:
View solution
Accounting Rate of Return uses:
View solution
NPV implicitly assumes intermediate cash flows are reinvested at:
View solution
MIRR addresses which limitation of IRR?
View solution
Sensitivity analysis is best described as:
View solution
In NPV computation, the discount rate used is typically:
View solution
"Real options" in capital budgeting value:
View solution
Conventional capital-budgeting techniques include:
View solution
An increase in working capital required by a project is treated as:
View solution
For *mutually exclusive* projects, when NPV and IRR conflict, you should rely on:
View solution
A project's IRR is 14 %; cost of capital is 12 %. The decision is to:
View solution
31.10 Quick Recall
- Capital budgeting — evaluate long-term investment projects; large, irreversible, long-horizon.
- Cash-flow rules: after-tax incremental flows; add back depreciation; include opportunity cost; exclude sunk cost; include side-effects; treat WC; include terminal value.
- Conventional / non-discounted: Payback (= Investment/Annual CF), ARR (= Avg PAT/Avg Investment).
- Scientific / discounted: NPV (= PV inflows − Investment), IRR (NPV = 0), MIRR, PI (= PV inflows/Investment), Discounted Payback.
- Decision rules: NPV > 0; IRR > cost of capital; PI > 1.
- NPV vs IRR: NPV is theoretically superior; IRR can yield multiple roots and unrealistic reinvestment.
- Risk techniques: RADR, CE, Sensitivity, Scenario, Simulation, Decision trees, Real options.
- Capital rationing — rank by PI.